|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
|
I just saw an interesting board for a good price. A 2006 DRAM 135 iSonic. Right now I sail a F2 Stoke 127 and I just sold a Rio M 2010 which I bought for my kids (unfortunately they don't like windsurfing). I liked the Rio for it's size (like iSonic also 80 cm) and nice jibing etc. but for me it's just too heavy.
I am considering the iSonic 135 now. Though I have been sailing for some years and am able to sail in foodstraps etc. I don't consider myself an advanced windsurfer. All I want is nice cruising on a lake nearby. I want early/easy planing and nice jibing. I am not sure this is the right board for me though. (but honestly I still am in love with the looks of the board LOL) I weigh 75kg. and my biggest sail is a North S-Type 8.4. Any suggestions? Should I try it or is it better to look elsewhere? Btw. I plan to go and get this board tomorow so... Best regards, André |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Dream Team - School Guru
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,060
|
Hi Andre,
You wrote: "All I want is nice cruising on a lake nearby. I want early/easy planing and nice jibing. I am not sure this is the right board for me though. (but honestly I still am in love with the looks of the board LOL)" While the Isonic 135 will indeed "cruise nicely" with your 8.4 m2, it's really a slalom race board. "Cruising" is not it's best feature..... speed is it's best feature! It will plane pretty early, but it may not be so easy to get it on plane in marginal conditions on fresh water. Nice jibing....... yes, if you already have the technique, or when you learn the technique. Isonics are not "easy jibers". I think a far better choice would be a Futura 133. Nearly as fast as the Isonic 135, much easier to sail fast, very easy to jibe, but it may not look so cool. Far better IMHO for "cruising" with an 8.4 m2 North S-Type. Hope this helps, Roger Last edited by Roger; 26th May 2011 at 04:27 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
|
Well thank you. maybe you're right! It's such a cool board but it might not look very cool with me on it LOL. Anyway... I just cancelled the purchase thanks to this and other observations. I will take a look into other light wind - easy planing, easy cruisin' options.
Best regards, André |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 797
|
AndreM,
Good call, Roger is right. This iSonics are exciting in the right hands, but not fun in the wrong hands. In time, you will get to the point where you may want to try an iSonic, but test drive one before buying if possible. The biggest advantage for intermediate sailors on an iS is the quick planing compared to other similar sized freeride boards (wider tail), but once moving, it can get wild pretty fast if there is much wind.
__________________
Toys: Formula 160; iSonic 111; HiFly Move 105; Tiga 263; '85 Mistral Superlight. Maui Sails TR 11.0; 9.2; 8.4; 7.6; 6.6; Maui Sails Switch 6.0; 5.2; Maui Sails Global 4.5; 4.0. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| isonic, isonic 135 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| End of Reign or just a mistake ? | Papounet | Free Forum | 6 | 15th May 2008 11:33 PM |
| Isonic 94 (2006-7) v Isonic 96 (2007-8) | rayberg | Ask Our Team | 0 | 24th November 2007 09:20 AM |
| Isonic 135 2006. | Guest | Free Forum | 0 | 28th April 2007 11:00 PM |
| fin for isonic 105 2006 | fotpap | Ask Our Team | 3 | 13th April 2007 11:41 PM |
| Isonic 135 2006 | JGue | Windsurfing School | 3 | 21st February 2007 11:36 AM |